Have you found yourself desperately googling Monstera identification or Monstera species and then gotten lost in the contradictory mess of information out there? I have! Heres my evaluation from scouring the sources.
A stunning mature leaf from a Monstera deliciosa plant
Plant taxonomy and nomenclature is a monstrously large subject. It's an entire scientific field revolving around the identification, description, naming and grouping of plants. In reality, taxonomy is an artificial system created by humans in an attempt to explain the world around us. It's not perfect and is subject to controversy. Botanical nomenclature is the official naming of plants. In this system, every plant is given a two-part Latin name made up of a genus and a species, termed a binomial name.
See the below article for more information on Latin naming:
Getting to grips with botanical Latin
All plants are in a continuous battle for light, water and space. They are constantly adapting to exploit and therefore thrive in their environment, with the overall aim of outcompeting other plants. The changes that help a plant survive are maintained through evolution, and these adaptions are shared across related species. This forms the basis of plant taxonomy.
Historically plants (and everything else!) were categorised solely based on their morphology - what they look like. This is useful as generally, due to evolution, plants that look similar are usually related in some way.
A statue depicting the evolution of monkey to man
But convergent evolution:
Convergent evolution is a process by which similar adaptions arise in unrelated groups of plants. This can throw a significant spanner in the categorisation of plants based solely on how they look.
As science continues to advance, we can learn vastly more about plants, and how they are related, using modern techniques such as DNA evidence and genetic studies. We are always improving our understanding of the plant world and how it is all connected. This can lead to some confusion as with more knowledge and understanding, the more we realise how wrong some plant classifications were!
Reclassification and naming:
We are now able to accurately deduce the genetic relationships between different plants and many have been reclassified as a result of this. However, it takes some time for that information to trickle down through the scientific community, to common garden knowledge. Often when plants are reclassified, the old classification becomes a synonym and some names stick!
Whilst changes to already learnt plant names can be irritating, this will stabilise over time and eventually lead to greater understanding and better plant care.
Now a real life, real confusing plant example!
A stunning Monstera deliciosa specimen at Bristol Aquarium
Monstera is a hugely popular genus of plants, and many species are commonly grown as houseplants. Monstera leaves are large and showy, they change structure with age, and watching them develop can be thoroughly interesting. Because of their popularity, trying to find accurate information online is very confusing, with common names vs Latin flying all over the place!
Monstera deliciosa vs Monstera borsigiana:
M. deliciosa appears to be one of the most common Monstera species, and this is the big one most people look to grow as their prized houseplant. A similar species, M. borsigiana is the most easily mistaken with this and commonly missold under the name M. deliciosa. It's a smaller version that looks similar. The best way to tell the difference is to look for "ruffles" on leaf stems, near the leaf base. These ruffles are a key identifier of a true M. deliciosa species.
A Monstera deliciosa, you can just see the stem ruffles
A lack of stem ruffles indicates your plant is likely an M. borsigiana. However, these ruffles come with age, so your plant may not be mature enough to show them yet!
Photo by Sylvie Tittel on Unsplash; A Monstera deliciosa var. borsigiana plant that appears to be lacking the characteristic stem ruffles
Another layer of confusion: M. borsigiana doesn’t seem to be a true species, I believe it is officially considered a variety. Varieties are a variation below the species level which has arisen naturally in the wild. In botanical nomenclature it is written as Monstera deliciosa var. borsigiana. From this name alone you can deduce the genus the plant resides in (Monstera), the species it has evolved from (M. deliciosa) and the exact classification of the plant (a variety).
Cultivars are a similar division below that of species, except they do not occur naturally in the wild, but have been cultivated artificially by selective breeding. Cultivar stands for “cultivated variety”. Artificial selection to produce cultivars occurs on a far smaller timescale compared to natural evolution. This is the basis of why many cultivars do not come true from seed and are best propagated through other methods, such as cuttings. The genetics of cultivars are generally not as stable as true varieties, as they have been bred quickly to show specific characteristics like a particular colour of a flower.
The names Monstera variegata and Monstera albo variegata are not true scientific names, and thus they are not true plant species. These names are misused the most online, referring to two distinct cultivars that have been produced from the species M. deliciosa. So there is Monstera ‘Albo-Variegata' which has white variegation, usually covering up to half a leaf.
The white variegation in a Monstera ‘Albo-Variegata' leaf
Monstera 'Thai Constellation' is the other cultivar; it has creamy-yellow variegation. The pattern is in much smaller sections scattered across the leaves, reminiscent of stars in a galaxy, hence the name M. 'Thai Constellation'.
Monstera 'Thai Constellation' with creamy yellow variegated leaves like a galaxy of stars.
Monstera obliqua vs Monstera adansonii
Monstera adansonii is also known as monkey mask
Pretty much anything labelled as Monstera obliqua won’t be this species but rather the very similar looking M. adansonii or a hybrid. M. obliqua is extremely rare, a botanical unicorn that has been documented in the wild less than 20 times ever. It has more hole than leaf, over 90% of the surface and is strikingly different from M. adansonii when you compare them directly.
The leaves of M. obliqua are extremely thin and smooth, comparable to a sheet of paper. Whereas in M. adansonii they are thicker and have a slightly rough texture. The holes also cover far, far less of the leaf area, around 50%.
A true Monstera obliqua leaf with over 80% holes by @mickmitty
It's due to the popularity of Monstera species as houseplants and shops struggling to meet this overwhelming demand that confusion develops. Most shops typically care about sales above all else and usually, the correct naming and labelling of plants is not a priority.
It's really tricky when plants get super popular and when places sell them without proper research, the incorrect names proliferate and cause confusion for all!